Billboard Theology: NZ Church Challenges the Virgin Birth (Video/Homily/Pic)

St. Matthew-in-the-City, Auckland, New Zealand, Archdeacon Glynn Cardy:

 

ED. NOTE: As you read the following consider these: Ignorance of Divine Mysteries – God is Spirit – The Power of God – Holy Fear – Divine Wisdom – The Fullness of Time – Full of Grace – Raparation…    

My Emphasis/My Comments

Billboard Theology Homily

To make the news at Christmas [?] it seems a priest just needs to question the literalness of a virgin giving birth. [Billboard advertising helps.] Many in society mistakenly think that to challenge literalism [Divine mysteries revealed by God…] is to challenge the norms of Christianity. What progressive interpretations try to do however is remove the supernatural obfuscation and delve into the deeper spiritual truth of this festival. [Try, and fail… The problem is exactly the opposite of what’s stated: progressive interpretations of delving into spiritual truth–that is, concrete experience of divine mysteries, or, “literal” spiritual truths if you prefer–are often obscured to these by ignorance of the very divine things of which they speak. There is lacking the necessary Divine Wisdom, which, requires holy fear to acquire, and all, according to the will of God to reveal them. It’s hard to imagine that proud statements and billboards offending such sublime mysteries of faith and His chosen instruments are an incentive to do so. And the cause of obfuscation is bad spirits.]

Christian fundamentalism believes a supernatural male God who lived above sent his sperm into the womb of the virgin Mary. [You know neither the Father or the Power of God, the Full of Grace, or the Incarnation and Conception of the Word made flesh; and thus, there is ignorance concerning the Nativity carried out in the fullness of time. Open your heart to the mystery of the holy night and the seed of your Mother will crush the head of the enemy who prevents your seeing…] Although there were a series of miraculous events surrounding Jesus’ birth – like wandering stars [The Morning Star still rises in the East after having first risen within the hearts of those rescued and redeemed.] and angelic choirs [Luke 2: 10-11] – the real miracle was his death and literal resurrection 33 years later. The importance of this literal resurrection is the belief that it was a cosmic transaction whereby the male God embraced humanity only after being satiated by Jesus’ innocent blood. [You can have no part of Him unless you are washed by the Blood and Water of the Lamb… The only Savior of the world.]

The Christmas billboard on a local fundamentalist church sums up this thesis. It reads: “Jesus born 2 die 4 u!” His birth was just an h’orderve before the main Calvary course.

No doubt on Christmas Eve when papers print the messages of Church leaders a few of them will serve up this fundamentalist thesis wrapped in a nice story.

Progressive Christianity believes the Christmas stories are fictitious accounts designed to introduce the radical nature of the adult Jesus. [?]They contrast the Lord and Saviour Caesar with the anomaly of a new ‘lord’ and ‘saviour’ born illegitimate in a squalid barn. At Bethlehem low-life shepherds and heathen travelers are welcome while the powerful and the priests aren’t. The stories introduce the topsy-turvy way of God, where the outsiders are invited in and the insiders ushered out.

Progressive Christianity doesn’t overlook Jesus’ life and rush to his death. Rather it sees the radical hospitality he offered to the poor, the despised, women, children, and the sick, and says: ‘this is the essence of God’. His death was a consequence of the offensive nature of that hospitality and his resurrection a symbolic vindication. [Death for sin first, eternal hospitality second.]

The Christmas billboard outside St Matthew-in-the-City lampoons literalism and invites people to think again about what a miracle is. Is the miracle a male God sending forth his divine sperm, or is the miracle that God is and always has been among the poor? The billboard has a sombre Joseph and a consoling Mary, with the caption “Poor Joseph. God is a hard act to follow.” [As horrible and evil as this statement is, my prayer is that you don’t go further and blaspheme the Holy Spirit.]

On Christmas Eve when papers print the messages of Church leaders one or two of them will offer up this progressive thesis, encouraging laughter, generosity, and maybe even controversy.

Fundamentalism believes that Christianity is essentially about individual salvation and admission to an after-life off the planet. What one believes rather than how one behaves is paramount. This planet is merely a testing ground. [Actually, Christianity awaits New Heavens and New Earth. Belief and behavior are both important. Some people come to believe in, or, allow themselves to be taught by false teachers about a Jesus who really is not Jesus at all, but instead, a Jesus that suits their own sinful behavior or lifestyles. The Truth is not in them.]

Progressive Christianity however emphasizes behaviour above belief. How one treats ones neighbours, enemies, and planet is the essence of faith. The celebration of the birth of Jesus is a celebration of God in every birth and every person.

For fundamentalist Christians the incarnation is about the miraculous arrival of a baby soon to die and by his blood save us. For progressive Christians the incarnation is about the miracle of this planet earth and all life that exists here.

Although fundamentalist and progressive Christianity stand in marked contrast to one another there are many other distinct and interesting theologies on Christmas. Yet the culture of the Church is such that differences are downplayed and commonality extolled. Variety is synthesized into a supposed unity creating a mushy middle way. Most church leaders follow this middle mush approach, trying to say something pertinent without offending anybody.

Progressive Christianity is distinctive in that not only does it articulate a clear view it is also interested in engaging with those who differ. Its vision is one of robust engagement. If every Christian thought the same not only would life be deadly boring but also the fullness of God would be diminished.[What? I should think that only faith and trust in the eternal plan of the Father can be diminished…] This is the consequence of its incarnational theology: God is among us; even among those we disagree with or dislike. [Yes, we all live, move, and find being in Him.]

One billboard that expresses middle mush reads, “I miss hearing you say ‘Merry Christmas’, and its signed ‘Jesus’. No one can take offense because no one is being asked to do or think anything particularly different, except say ‘Merry Christmas’.

No doubt on Christmas Eve when papers print the messages of Church leaders most of them will serve up this middle mush. Jesus will be born in a palatial sanitized barn and every king and crook, religious and irreligious, will be surrounding him saying ‘Merry Christmas my friends!’ No reader will be asked to do or think anything risky, no reader will be offended, and no reader will write a critical response. They’ll just yawn and turn the page.

And now, some prayer of reparation…

END OF POST

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s