Anti Prop. 8 Law Professor: “Court unlikely to overturn Proposition ‘H8’”

"We will fight hate with hate..."
It looks as if overturning the people’s will on Proposition 8 by the California Supreme Court has run into a snag or two, that is if anti Prop. 8 law professor Robert Dekoven is correct.
Commenting in the online mag Gay and Lesbian Times Professor Dekoven made this assessment on chances of Prop 8 being overturned:
“Now that the California Supreme Court has accepted review of Proposition “H8” but refused to stay its enforcement, it’s unlikely to overturn the measure. The court’s action indicates that legal arguments opposing Proposition 8 are weak. Further, we’ve probably lost our most vocal advocate, Justice Joyce Kennard – the only justice who voted not to hear legal challenges against it.”
Dekoven further states:
“The two arguments up for review include: that the measure surpasses the legal scope of a ballot initiative by permitting a majority to limit a minority group’s rights; and that it disturbs the constitutional separation of powers by restricting judicial authority. As for Justice Kennard’s stance, it shows she views the constitutionality of the measure as being so irrefutable it doesn’t merit review.”
So where will anti 8 supporters turn next? Professor Dekoven suggests justifying gay marriage on the grounds of how children will be effected:
“Consequently, at both the state and federal level we need to leverage an additional argument to support same-sex marriage: We need to emphasize the effect that prohibiting it would have on the children same-sex couples adopt. It’s an argument we haven’t used yet and one that if we don’t will guarantee we lose…”

One thought on “Anti Prop. 8 Law Professor: “Court unlikely to overturn Proposition ‘H8’””

  1. I think the Yes, on Prop 8 also think they have a good chance in court. See this link from their website.

    These Yes, on 8 people were really organized. I live in California and they had sent me a form to gather signitures for this proposition a few weeks before the initial ruling by the California Supreme court last April. They were way ahead of the game and knew that the Supreme Court was going to rule for gay marriage and they were ready to fight them. I was actually bewildered when I received the packet to collect signitures because I thought we had this sewed up when Prop 22 passed by 60 % ten years ago. That was the last time we voted in California to have marriage between one man and one woman. I thought the Supreme Court would have to rule with the people.

    So if these people think that the courts will have to rule in favor of the people this time – there probably is a good chance that they know what they are talking about.

    I think the Yes on 8 organization should be tapped into to organize for the Republican party – they really did a great job.



Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s